SUPREME INDEPENDENCE?

Independence is a historical foundational principle as it is written in the Declaration of Independence and must be included as such in government. Yet, Independence is written only once in the United States Constitution and that's:

....of the Independence of the Republic of the United States of America....

in the last paragraph of the document, just before the signatures of the ratifiers. It is thus a requirement of the US and its government that shall not be denied

I have three problems with the treatment of our United States of America's Independence. They are that "maneuverers within the system" who use various artifices to "get what they want:

1. commonly rename things to avoid their agendas being discovered non-Constitutional,
2. use the names, but don't "let the rest of the world" know what they mean the word to mean, how they use it in that meaning and what the consequences of that use are, which seem often to be non-Constitutional and should not be allowed.
3. the Supreme Law of the Land as it is described in the body, then should exclude all laws, treaties, agreements, etc. that give up Independence of the United States of America;but, it does not, it defines it otherwise.

That makes many presently practiced "pseudo-agreements" of our presently acticing government void and non-Constitutional, and needs vigorous correction. It starts with all forms of "World Courts" and "World Governments" that give up this Independence in the words of their "charters". Such "groups" that appear to be attempting to encroach our US Independence now do include: The United Nations, The World Bank, The International Monetary Fund, and others.

This is not to say that such organizations could not be created to perform many or most of the "good functions" that they do. It's just that right now they are putting at undue risk the Independence of the Republic, with charter documents that are non-Constitutional in giving up Independence of the United States of America, quite insidiously and unnecessarily to do so.

It is often said that only the original meaning of the words of the Constitution are valid. However, none of us know what that is. So the alternative is to use Jury-determined present "street English" meanings when interpretation is needed. Recall the Constitution does not give the Judiciary the right or power of Judicial review, and certainly not judges without juries

The gamesmanship allowed in the first two difficulties listed above, must not be allowed. Their disallowance is a power granted to none in government, so it resides again in juries.